|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:39 pm
I read this line: "There is no way to disaggregate discrimination on the basis of transgender status from discrimination on the basis of gender non-conformity, and we see no reason to try." as a snarky way of saying: "Po-TAY-to, Po-TAH-to, why are we arguing about this??" rofl
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:00 pm
Took me a couple re-readings to fully comprehend what was being said but it does have a snarky tone to it, don't it? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 5:46 pm
Prof. Moonie Took me a couple re-readings to fully comprehend what was being said but it does have a snarky tone to it, don't it? sweatdrop My professor says that "legalese" is its own language. rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 2:37 pm
These guys have excellent management takeaways:
https://www.fisherphillips.com
https://www.fisherphillips.com/resources-alerts-another-landmark-ruling-court-says-transgender-discrimination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:19 pm
I guess it sort of sounds snarky, but it's still not really making sense to me. I hope this helps answer your question. Take care of yourself!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
