|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:50 pm
|
|
|
|
;___; I'm a 34B, and I haate it. I wish I could go up a size, and it's not that anyone picks on me or anything, but my best friend is a 36F. F. F. F. F. It's not that she's overweight or anything, it's just her genes. But she's constantly picking on me for having crazy small bewbs. ;_; My boyfriend doesn't seem to mind them, though. and hell, if he's happy, then I'm happy. XD ;_;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:55 pm
|
|
|
|
chocolatepancakeninja um im sorry but i dont agree with the first thing you said...they cant just be sexual out of nowhere what caused them to be so sexually attractive? something started that craze but what? because i know in ancient times a woman who had big breasts well was seen as a very motherly person so how did motherly breasts become sexually attractive breasts? hmmm i think maybe because of that state of motherlyness must have attracted men to them because it means they are going to be good mothers to their children and how do you have children sexual intercourse correct? well i guess with that state of mind it changed from her being a good mother to holy crap shes got huge tits and i want to bang her...(i felt very uncomfortable typing that) but still thats what i think and...um your explanation was very...interesting yeah
You must not have read what I said in my first sentence. Let me re-word what I said. And to clarify now, not everyone thinks big boobs are hot however ALL breasts are sexual regardless of size.
When we were on all fours males were largely attracted to our asses because we had sex from the rear. Therefore a** = males to the rear bang bang there's a baby. When we started walking upright, missionary was the BEST, for having successful fertilization, way to have sex. Now if our asses had stayed the most attractive part of the body, then we would still be having sex from the rear which is NOT the best way to have babies. So nature needed something to make the males want to have sex with the women from the front, hence boobs got bigger.
If you still don't get it. The females who didn't have boobs DIED OUT! Why you say, because no one had sex with them and therefore their genes did not get passed on. Only the ones who had some sort of boobage had their genes passed and that is why there are boobs today.
Boobs have been sexual since we were standing up straight.
And here's something for you. Are you attracted to 300lb women? No because there are tribes in Africa that are. Or maybe you are, and skinny women put you off. The point I'm making with this is yes, there have been and still are people who look at boobs and say "Hey they must be a good mom because she has boobs." But just because that's what they thought doesn't mean that's what everyone did/does or will think. Hell at one point if a woman showed her knees, or ankles even, it was considered the same as if a woman showed her boobs today. You can't go off of history and what they found attractive. Attractiveness is a subconscious attraction to certain genes. For males it's largely based on hips boobs and body shape, regardless of what you may or may not think.
Like I said, nature is ******** amazing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:17 am
|
|
|
|
God-Raped-Me chocolatepancakeninja um im sorry but i dont agree with the first thing you said...they cant just be sexual out of nowhere what caused them to be so sexually attractive? something started that craze but what? because i know in ancient times a woman who had big breasts well was seen as a very motherly person so how did motherly breasts become sexually attractive breasts? hmmm i think maybe because of that state of motherlyness must have attracted men to them because it means they are going to be good mothers to their children and how do you have children sexual intercourse correct? well i guess with that state of mind it changed from her being a good mother to holy crap shes got huge tits and i want to bang her...(i felt very uncomfortable typing that) but still thats what i think and...um your explanation was very...interesting yeah You must not have read what I said in my first sentence. Let me re-word what I said. And to clarify now, not everyone thinks big boobs are hot however ALL breasts are sexual regardless of size. When we were on all fours males were largely attracted to our asses because we had sex from the rear. Therefore a** = males to the rear bang bang there's a baby. When we started walking upright, missionary was the BEST, for having successful fertilization, way to have sex. Now if our asses had stayed the most attractive part of the body, then we would still be having sex from the rear which is NOT the best way to have babies. So nature needed something to make the males want to have sex with the women from the front, hence boobs got bigger. If you still don't get it. The females who didn't have boobs DIED OUT! Why you say, because no one had sex with them and therefore their genes did not get passed on. Only the ones who had some sort of boobage had their genes passed and that is why there are boobs today. Boobs have been sexual since we were standing up straight. And here's something for you. Are you attracted to 300lb women? No because there are tribes in Africa that are. Or maybe you are, and skinny women put you off. The point I'm making with this is yes, there have been and still are people who look at boobs and say "Hey they must be a good mom because she has boobs." But just because that's what they thought doesn't mean that's what everyone did/does or will think. Hell at one point if a woman showed her knees, or ankles even, it was considered the same as if a woman showed her boobs today. You can't go off of history and what they found attractive. Attractiveness is a subconscious attraction to certain genes. For males it's largely based on hips boobs and body shape, regardless of what you may or may not think. Like I said, nature is ******** amazing! alright alright you win
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:21 pm
|
|
|
|
God-Raped-Me You must not have read what I said in my first sentence. Let me re-word what I said. And to clarify now, not everyone thinks big boobs are hot however ALL breasts are sexual regardless of size. When we were on all fours males were largely attracted to our asses because we had sex from the rear. Therefore a** = males to the rear bang bang there's a baby. When we started walking upright, missionary was the BEST, for having successful fertilization, way to have sex. Now if our asses had stayed the most attractive part of the body, then we would still be having sex from the rear which is NOT the best way to have babies. So nature needed something to make the males want to have sex with the women from the front, hence boobs got bigger. If you still don't get it. The females who didn't have boobs DIED OUT! Why you say, because no one had sex with them and therefore their genes did not get passed on. Only the ones who had some sort of boobage had their genes passed and that is why there are boobs today. Boobs have been sexual since we were standing up straight. And here's something for you. Are you attracted to 300lb women? No because there are tribes in Africa that are. Or maybe you are, and skinny women put you off. The point I'm making with this is yes, there have been and still are people who look at boobs and say "Hey they must be a good mom because she has boobs." But just because that's what they thought doesn't mean that's what everyone did/does or will think. Hell at one point if a woman showed her knees, or ankles even, it was considered the same as if a woman showed her boobs today. You can't go off of history and what they found attractive. Attractiveness is a subconscious attraction to certain genes. For males it's largely based on hips boobs and body shape, regardless of what you may or may not think. Like I said, nature is ******** amazing!
That's not entirely accurate. Mammals have had mammary glands long before the emergence of humanity. Those were kept naturally because infants would die without them.
Also, sex from the rear while may not be imagined as preferable, child birth from that angle was much safer and easier. See, due to the design of the pelvic bones, Humans have to push that infant through a gap in bone, where as chimps and gorillas pelvic bones aren't designed to support their upper bodies for upright walking and thus their bones are pushed back more. Child birth is far less painful for them.
Nature is neat but sometimes evolution works against us too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|