|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:03 am
HSM sucks, but I must endure it because my girlfriend loves it, which I fail to understand what it is she loves about it, the music sucks, the actor's "acting" isn't that great, and the story is just predictable. Anyone able to explain the appeal to me?
Edit: After reading the story, I have to raise a bullshit flag, mostly because it was published by the National Enquirer(sp?) and it's really hard for me to trust a tabloid magazine about anything really. Funny little story anyway.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:08 am
What I don't understand is the idea that having naked pictures of yourself (even if it's for your boyfriend, rather than just...nekkid pictures) automatically makes you not a role-model for younger kids. Since when is nudity evil, or even wrong? confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:11 am
Crimson_Immortal What I don't understand is the idea that having naked pictures of yourself (even if it's for your boyfriend, rather than just...nekkid pictures) automatically makes you not a role-model for younger kids. Since when is nudity evil, or even wrong? confused
/;[You took me home];
/;[I drank too much];
Nudity isn't evil, but the purpose for being so is.
She gave him pictures to arouse sexual attention.
/;[Cause of you my liver turned to dust];
/;[Cold rust tastes cold creeping cold pain];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:16 am
Larxeis Crimson_Immortal What I don't understand is the idea that having naked pictures of yourself (even if it's for your boyfriend, rather than just...nekkid pictures) automatically makes you not a role-model for younger kids. Since when is nudity evil, or even wrong? confused
/;[You took me home];
/;[I drank too much];
Nudity isn't evil, but the purpose for being so is.
She gave him pictures to arouse sexual attention.
/;[Cause of you my liver turned to dust];
/;[Cold rust tastes cold creeping cold pain];
Again - why is that evil? She's of legal age (I know it varies state-by-state, but I think the standard/highest age is 18 ), and I'd assume her boyfriend is too because otherwise there'd be stories about police investigating it instead of just "OMG SHE R NEKKID!!" stories. If they're in a relationship, why shouldn't she try to keep him interested? And besides, it's not like she got piss-drunk and puked all over the place (public spectacle) or killed someone (definitely wrong) - she apparently tried to give her bf a romantic gift that apparently got leaked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:29 am
Crimson_Immortal Larxeis Crimson_Immortal What I don't understand is the idea that having naked pictures of yourself (even if it's for your boyfriend, rather than just...nekkid pictures) automatically makes you not a role-model for younger kids. Since when is nudity evil, or even wrong? confused
/;[You took me home];
/;[I drank too much];
Nudity isn't evil, but the purpose for being so is.
She gave him pictures to arouse sexual attention.
/;[Cause of you my liver turned to dust];
/;[Cold rust tastes cold creeping cold pain];
Again - why is that evil? She's of legal age (I know it varies state-by-state, but I think the standard/highest age is 18 ), and I'd assume her boyfriend is too because otherwise there'd be stories about police investigating it instead of just "OMG SHE R NEKKID!!" stories. If they're in a relationship, why shouldn't she try to keep him interested? And besides, it's not like she got piss-drunk and puked all over the place (public spectacle) or killed someone (definitely wrong) - she apparently tried to give her bf a romantic gift that apparently got leaked.
/;[You took me home];
/;[I drank too much];
That's true, but there are those uber-
Christians out there who still believe
any type of sexuality before marriage
is wrong. That's probably why there are
people freaking out about it.
/;[Cause of you my liver turned to dust];
/;[Cold rust tastes cold creeping cold pain];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 9:47 pm
Larxeis Crimson_Immortal Larxeis Crimson_Immortal What I don't understand is the idea that having naked pictures of yourself (even if it's for your boyfriend, rather than just...nekkid pictures) automatically makes you not a role-model for younger kids. Since when is nudity evil, or even wrong? confused
/;[You took me home];
/;[I drank too much];
Nudity isn't evil, but the purpose for being so is.
She gave him pictures to arouse sexual attention.
/;[Cause of you my liver turned to dust];
/;[Cold rust tastes cold creeping cold pain];
Again - why is that evil? She's of legal age (I know it varies state-by-state, but I think the standard/highest age is 18 ), and I'd assume her boyfriend is too because otherwise there'd be stories about police investigating it instead of just "OMG SHE R NEKKID!!" stories. If they're in a relationship, why shouldn't she try to keep him interested? And besides, it's not like she got piss-drunk and puked all over the place (public spectacle) or killed someone (definitely wrong) - she apparently tried to give her bf a romantic gift that apparently got leaked.
/;[You took me home];
/;[I drank too much];
That's true, but there are those uber-
Christians out there who still believe
any type of sexuality before marriage
is wrong. That's probably why there are
people freaking out about it.
/;[Cause of you my liver turned to dust];
/;[Cold rust tastes cold creeping cold pain];
'Tis the reason why porn is for old people who like to ejaculate...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:04 pm
Part of the problem as to why this whole thing with Vanessa is big is that people tend to think that if an actor who performed in a children's movie/television show is doing things unsuitable for children then it's wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:58 am
[Tsukasa567] HSM sucks, but I must endure it because my girlfriend loves it, which I fail to understand what it is she loves about it, the music sucks, the actor's "acting" isn't that great, and the story is just predictable. Anyone able to explain the appeal to me? Edit: After reading the story, I have to raise a bullshit flag, mostly because it was published by the National Enquirer(sp?) and it's really hard for me to trust a tabloid magazine about anything really. Funny little story anyway. yup! i also call bullshit! besides the fact that it was the national enquirer reporting, i'm almost completely positive that their whole "relationship" is a big marketing scam, ya know? confused something about it just isn't quite right...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:10 pm
Oh great. How am I supposed to shut up the eight-year olds when they start talking about this now!? stressed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:15 pm
alrighty, i went and checked out the pic @ perezhilton.com and i don't think its her.
the head shape is kinda weird and its just fuzzy enough so that its hard to tell if its reeeeeally her or not, so i'm gonna say not.
plus, its not like a naughty pic a normal 18yr old would take for her boyfriend. ya know, something with a webcam or something ((in other words, a pic you take all on your own)). its like, a full body shot as though someone else took it, and i doubt she'd be that brave. 3nodding
so yeah, i don't believe it. its a malicious rumor and whoever started it ought to be ashamed of themselves! stressed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:16 am
Yeah dont care...
just the fact that I thought you ment "his majesty" by hms...
Which makes the title totaly random....
I find my fun in my own little ways*skips of sniggering*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:41 am
it will be forgotten in a weeks time and no one really cares right now anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:10 am
OH SNAPZ!
she admitted it WAS her and apologized for the embarassment to disney!
crying crying crying
poor vanessa!!! i mean, you try to do something cute for your boyfriend and some a*****e steals your pic and leaks it to the whole ******** world?!? that's so messed up! stressed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:52 pm
Crimson_Immortal Larxeis Crimson_Immortal What I don't understand is the idea that having naked pictures of yourself (even if it's for your boyfriend, rather than just...nekkid pictures) automatically makes you not a role-model for younger kids. Since when is nudity evil, or even wrong? confused
/;[You took me home];
/;[I drank too much];
Nudity isn't evil, but the purpose for being so is.
She gave him pictures to arouse sexual attention.
/;[Cause of you my liver turned to dust];
/;[Cold rust tastes cold creeping cold pain];
Again - why is that evil? She's of legal age (I know it varies state-by-state, but I think the standard/highest age is 18 ), and I'd assume her boyfriend is too because otherwise there'd be stories about police investigating it instead of just "OMG SHE R NEKKID!!" stories. If they're in a relationship, why shouldn't she try to keep him interested? And besides, it's not like she got piss-drunk and puked all over the place (public spectacle) or killed someone (definitely wrong) - she apparently tried to give her bf a romantic gift that apparently got leaked. You can blame christian soccer-moms/extremists for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
