|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:15 am
macs are now and forever for babies. they were designed for people who knew nothing about computers. they're STILL designed for people who know nothing about computers.
and you can modify a pc to do just about anything, but why you'd WANT to run a mac app on a pc is beyond ANYONE, so they don't.
its kinda like how people can't even be bothered to make viruses for macs ((although there ARE a few out there now)) bc they're TOYS and not computers. its not bc macs are so super awesome and virus-proof, its bc NO ONE CARES.
pfffffffffffft on macs. pfffft.
edit: also, lmao @ large font. yelling on the internet: the next best thing to being right. rofl
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:51 am
bluegrass cat macs are now and forever for babies. they were designed for people who knew nothing about computers. they're STILL designed for people who know nothing about computers. and you can modify a pc to do just about anything, but why you'd WANT to run a mac app on a pc is beyond ANYONE, so they don't. its kinda like how people can't even be bothered to make viruses for macs ((although there ARE a few out there now)) bc they're TOYS and not computers. its not bc macs are so super awesome and virus-proof, its bc NO ONE CARES. pfffffffffffft on macs. pfffft. edit: also, lmao @ large font. yelling on the internet: the next best thing to being right. rofl Macs are not for babies, they are the most user-friendly. I myself have a Windows XP and i prefer my Intel-Mac over my windows because my mace is waaay faster than my windows. And Macs are also used more in the graphics/animation kind of jobs. bc they're TOYS and not computers my a**, Macs have waaaay more animation/computer graphic applications/hardware than Windows. Check your facts before you say Macs are toys. -Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:04 pm
TheBlueWarrior Artanus USING BIG LETTERS MAKES ME SOUND SMARTER!But seriously, Macs can be very god computers in themselves. But between Macs and PC's I'd take the latter. If its a god computer, wouldn't that mean PC's are inferior? xD Haha, woops. Macs are now officially omnipotent and rule the universe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:29 am
Artanus TheBlueWarrior Artanus USING BIG LETTERS MAKES ME SOUND SMARTER!But seriously, Macs can be very god computers in themselves. But between Macs and PC's I'd take the latter. If its a god computer, wouldn't that mean PC's are inferior? xD Haha, woops. Macs are now officially omnipotent and rule the universe Well said smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:16 am
Mr Tuu Tuu bluegrass cat macs are now and forever for babies. they were designed for people who knew nothing about computers. they're STILL designed for people who know nothing about computers. and you can modify a pc to do just about anything, but why you'd WANT to run a mac app on a pc is beyond ANYONE, so they don't. its kinda like how people can't even be bothered to make viruses for macs ((although there ARE a few out there now)) bc they're TOYS and not computers. its not bc macs are so super awesome and virus-proof, its bc NO ONE CARES. pfffffffffffft on macs. pfffft. edit: also, lmao @ large font. yelling on the internet: the next best thing to being right. rofl Macs are not for babies, they are the most user-friendly. I myself have a Windows XP and i prefer my Intel-Mac over my windows because my mace is waaay faster than my windows. And Macs are also used more in the graphics/animation kind of jobs. bc they're TOYS and not computers my a**, Macs have waaaay more animation/computer graphic applications/hardware than Windows. Check your facts before you say Macs are toys. -Thanks You must be a baby. Macs are toys. I know facts. ???? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:18 pm
Mr Tuu Tuu bluegrass cat macs are now and forever for babies. they were designed for people who knew nothing about computers. they're STILL designed for people who know nothing about computers. and you can modify a pc to do just about anything, but why you'd WANT to run a mac app on a pc is beyond ANYONE, so they don't. its kinda like how people can't even be bothered to make viruses for macs ((although there ARE a few out there now)) bc they're TOYS and not computers. its not bc macs are so super awesome and virus-proof, its bc NO ONE CARES. pfffffffffffft on macs. pfffft. edit: also, lmao @ large font. yelling on the internet: the next best thing to being right. rofl Macs are not for babies, they are the most user-friendly. I myself have a Windows XP and i prefer my Intel-Mac over my windows because my mace is waaay faster than my windows. And Macs are also used more in the graphics/animation kind of jobs. bc they're TOYS and not computers my a**, Macs have waaaay more animation/computer graphic applications/hardware than Windows. Check your facts before you say Macs are toys. -Thanks You're right, they are most often used in animation and graphics jobs. I'm actually taking an Advertising and graphic design class using macs. So lets review: They're used for cartoons used for games Used to bring joy to children sounds like a toy. It doesn't have be a bad thing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:58 pm
Mr Tuu Tuu Artanus TheBlueWarrior Artanus USING BIG LETTERS MAKES ME SOUND SMARTER!But seriously, Macs can be very god computers in themselves. But between Macs and PC's I'd take the latter. If its a god computer, wouldn't that mean PC's are inferior? xD Haha, woops. Macs are now officially omnipotent and rule the universe Well said smile Also LOL for not understanding interwebz sarcasm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:59 pm
Artanus Mr Tuu Tuu bluegrass cat macs are now and forever for babies. they were designed for people who knew nothing about computers. they're STILL designed for people who know nothing about computers. and you can modify a pc to do just about anything, but why you'd WANT to run a mac app on a pc is beyond ANYONE, so they don't. its kinda like how people can't even be bothered to make viruses for macs ((although there ARE a few out there now)) bc they're TOYS and not computers. its not bc macs are so super awesome and virus-proof, its bc NO ONE CARES. pfffffffffffft on macs. pfffft. edit: also, lmao @ large font. yelling on the internet: the next best thing to being right. rofl Macs are not for babies, they are the most user-friendly. I myself have a Windows XP and i prefer my Intel-Mac over my windows because my mace is waaay faster than my windows. And Macs are also used more in the graphics/animation kind of jobs. bc they're TOYS and not computers my a**, Macs have waaaay more animation/computer graphic applications/hardware than Windows. Check your facts before you say Macs are toys. -Thanks You're right, they are most often used in animation and graphics jobs. I'm actually taking an Advertising and graphic design class using macs. So lets review: They're used for cartoons used for games Used to bring joy to children sounds like a toy. It doesn't have be a bad thing The way bluegrass and angel_half are bringing it up sounds like they mean a bad thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:02 pm
I bet you cant even give a good explanation about how macs suck? Macs are now Omni-compatible and can do Mac, Linux, and Windows (Linux if you get an emulator) so why bother getting a windows when you could get an Intell-based mac? I dont see Windows working mac apps and you dont see windows emulating Linux very often either. Burn. ~Gf'd Oh, and angel, internet text sarcasm is like winking through a telephone. gf'd #2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:46 pm
Mr Tuu Tuu I bet you cant even give a good explanation about how macs suck? Macs are now Omni-compatible and can do Mac, Linux, and Windows (Linux if you get an emulator) so why bother getting a windows when you could get an Intell-based mac? I dont see Windows working mac apps and you dont see windows emulating Linux very often either. Burn. ~Gf'd Oh, and angel, internet text sarcasm is like winking through a telephone. gf'd #2 My PC is Intel-based Also, saying "burn" and "gf'd" (whatever that is) make you sound like a douche.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:49 pm
Mr Tuu Tuu I bet you cant even give a good explanation about how macs suck? Macs are now Omni-compatible and can do Mac, Linux, and Windows (Linux if you get an emulator) so why bother getting a windows when you could get an Intell-based mac? I dont see Windows working mac apps and you dont see windows emulating Linux very often either. Burn. ~Gf'd Oh, and angel, internet text sarcasm is like winking through a telephone. gf'd #2 if you can't READ sarcasm and pick up on it, then chances are good that you fail at life. as far as WHY macs suck: list of why it sucksolder list of why they suckvideo of why they sucksouthpark pc vs mac vs linux videoand, my daddy worked for ibm and we i had my own computer by the time i was three. basic, qbasic and ms-dos was all you needed. then macs came out and idiots who had NO IDEA about computers, or how they worked or what they could REALLY do bought them to do...idk. idk wtf you could even do on one of those early macs. i was playing kickass games like the original king's quest, pacman, and oregon trail on my 1984 pc jr and it was friggin' awesome. my current computer is ALSO awesome bc not ONLY did i get it for a steal, but i can make it more powerful, faster, and more kickass than any mac on the market by simply switching out parts and upgrading. there. i said it. edit: tuu tuu, what was your name before you changed it? bc for some reason i'm on your friends list but i don't remember you. stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:57 pm
Mr Tuu Tuu I bet you cant even give a good explanation about how macs suck? Macs are now Omni-compatible and can do Mac, Linux, and Windows (Linux if you get an emulator) so why bother getting a windows when you could get an Intell-based mac? I dont see Windows working mac apps and you dont see windows emulating Linux very often either. Burn. ~Gf'd Oh, and angel, internet text sarcasm is like winking through a telephone. gf'd #2 I'll give you one good reason why macs suck. You can't upgrade them. Once they become obsolete then you might as well throw them away. They are a plug and play and there is nothing l337 about owning a mac. Oh and you have been successfully trolld.  Macs suck. EDIT: Does Gf'd stand for Get ********? wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:23 pm
bluegrass cat Mr Tuu Tuu I bet you cant even give a good explanation about how macs suck? Macs are now Omni-compatible and can do Mac, Linux, and Windows (Linux if you get an emulator) so why bother getting a windows when you could get an Intell-based mac? I dont see Windows working mac apps and you dont see windows emulating Linux very often either. Burn. ~Gf'd Oh, and angel, internet text sarcasm is like winking through a telephone. gf'd #2 if you can't READ sarcasm and pick up on it, then chances are good that you fail at life. as far as WHY macs suck: list of why it sucksolder list of why they suckvideo of why they sucksouthpark pc vs mac vs linux videoand, my daddy worked for ibm and we i had my own computer by the time i was three. basic, qbasic and ms-dos was all you needed. then macs came out and idiots who had NO IDEA about computers, or how they worked or what they could REALLY do bought them to do...idk. idk wtf you could even do on one of those early macs. i was playing kickass games like the original king's quest, pacman, and oregon trail on my 1984 pc jr and it was friggin' awesome. my current computer is ALSO awesome bc not ONLY did i get it for a steal, but i can make it more powerful, faster, and more kickass than any mac on the market by simply switching out parts and upgrading. there. i said it. edit: tuu tuu, what was your name before you changed it? bc for some reason i'm on your friends list but i don't remember you. stare Bluegrass, Race: Human, Class: Argument ender
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:25 pm
alignment: Chaotic Neutral (In most cases)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
