|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 1:03 pm
lyworm I suppose that's partly because I've had bad experiences. A few boys that I tried to get to trust and ended up alone with ended up kissing me. So yuh. That's a bad experience? They were probably just misreading signals. Trust me, a stolen kiss isn't so bad, compared to what could have happened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 1:14 pm
its kool to go to an all girls skool but they should still teach you about guys and stuff like in health women desearve to no how a guys repraductive system works if you know and how to defend your self against men or what not.
i go to a public school so its co-ed and we learn all that stuff in heath classes i think they should do that even if its all girls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 1:36 pm
I guess getting a good education is good but girls that go to all girls schools don't know how to socialize with men. They only know how to act around other girls because that's what they're exposed to all day. Unless they have a sweet-heart outside of school, they won't know how to act in the real worldwhen they are in an environment that DOESN'T exclude guys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:49 pm
Yah...lol...militant feminists are funny.
It depends on where you go. Girls stereotypically tend to be affected by being surrounded by the same sex for long periods of time than guys do, donno why. But then again, thats "stereotypically". The administration is probably just trying to brainwash their students into hating men, you gotta watch out for schools that do that, there are a quite a few too many. ( Crazy theory above /) I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:09 pm
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:36 pm
A few thoughts for your contemplation:
-I got a fabulous education with both sexes in attendence. -It is very difficult, however, to concentrate on class and the cute boy sitting next to you, smelling so very good. -I am socially inept with boys as well.
My opinion? I don't think it matters either way. If you like the school, fine. But you can end up inept with boys in either situation, can get a good education in either situation... It's really a personal choice in which you'd feel most comfortable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:59 pm
I think everything is good as long as you have variety. When I was in high school, we had a very good mix of people, not just with gender, but racially, religiously, and socio-econimically, etc.. This seems to ensure that you're able to deal with all people, no matter where they come from. Now I'm in college, and the college is no where near as diverse as from where I come from. What's sad is that recently, I've seen so much hate for other races, religions, and sexual orientation. This hate is for no good reason except for sheer ignorance. Most of the people who go to this college are white, middle to upper class people who only know Christianity and think anyone that isn't the same skin color will rob them or that the pagans will try to make them go to hell.
It distresses me very much that the women of your school and the administration is anti-men. It just seems a step backward for everyone that will create more unneeded hate in the future. But that's just my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 10:22 am
I don't really like single sex schools...it doesn't encourage girls to be able to cope socially with men...I have a friend who went to an all girls school and because of it she isn't very confident around men... and I also totally disagree with anti-man attitude...yes it's right to be able to defend yourself but not all men are like that..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 2:45 pm
I think the entire idea of our public school system is bat s**t ******** crazy. The primary example of why is the example of expecting kids to be/become responsible. Clue train to stupid society: where the hell is this responsibility supposed to come from? Out of thin air? The school system the way it is designed expects this! Removing the kid from their parents most of the time, placing them into an artificial society where the only other people they can really learn respect from is people of the same age.
Seriously, people think public school is better than home-schooling because your kids get to socialize, right? But what in the world makes people think that sort of socialization is necessarily healthy or desirable? In a healthier society kids would be socializing with other kids of varying ages and more adults and would learn directly from them about what it means to be responsible! By forcing kids to really only interact with other people their age they completely break any possible chain of learning from the older generations, education in general becomes a sterile, isolated learning experience with less world-value connection, and most importantly it creates the previously-mention artificial society which is absolutely nothing like the real world! (Well, japanese high schools in anime are better since they have to manage projects during culture festivals, often with a goal of making money.)
That entire rant may seem almost unrelated to the issue in this thread but actually I'd argue it's worse. See, I think the sorts of problems I was talking about would only be worse in a single-gendered education system. Possibly not the age-segregation problem, but most definitely the artificial society problem. But, I dunno, I find most of our society takes common actions for granted when the underlying premisses are down-right stupid and completely unjustifiable.
On another note, it just occured to me that all-girl schools might simply attract militant feminists instead of creating them... where else would people like that go to stay in a delusional bubble?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 12:38 am
I disagree with you on the public school system, as there is plenty of interaction between students of all grade levels and ages. I don't know about yours, but all of my public schools encouraged older students to help out the younger students, even to the point of having high schoolers go down to the local elementary school to volunteer and help out. While no school can perfectly recreate the "real world" environment, public school is the closest thing you can get to short of tossing your kid on the street to fend for themselves.
Single-sex schools certainly are even worse comparisons to the real world than public schools, so I see your argument there. I recently spoke to a friend of mine who went to a single-sex school, and she said the primary reason for segregation was that they were afraid of the girls being overshadowed in classes by boys, leading them to be more docile and less confident. She was very surprised to learn that in my school the girls often did much better and were more confident than the boys in class.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 6:24 am
I still see a problem with the high-school volunteer system; it's still optional and not really the same sort of community as the students are in with eachother. It's better than nothing but still feels closer to teachers getting help instead of encouraging inter-age friendships. See, the "help out" is still all about the education and helping the younger generations educationally, yet socialization is the reason people say home-schooling isn't good. It looks about as good a bond as a student-teacher bond, which is good, but not quite enough.
Of course, that also demonstrates a fundamental problem with even trying to fix the problem with our current system. If there were a group of high school students talking with eachother outside an elementary school you'd bet that somebody would call the police. Also, who knows how many generations it would take to fix the problems created in the first place?
Yeah, step in the right direction, but still leaves kids in an artificial environment with artificial non-real-world-value education. You don't want to recreate the "real world" environment... you want to introduce them to it! You want to walk them through it! It's all ideal, though, possibly not practical for everybody to do.
(The final point here is that, if your local elementary/middle/high schools (and college) are like mine then they're completely separate from eachother, on the other side of town, etc. Segregation by age...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 8:45 am
I wanted to make a good, thurough example to demonstrate what I'm trying to get at (but had to leave for work.) Of course, I also just realized that me being here at work is another good example. How often are children going to be seeing that in order to do my job I will need to ___, ___, and need to know ___? Sure, maybe there's the occasional time that somebody's kids are brought to work, but do they see that one time when it's worth it to have taken linear algebra? Or computer graphics? Or english composition? Or when you need to add numbers together to verify a calculation? How involved are kids in doing taxes and job hunting? Is it not unusual for them to have to do this stuff almost by themselves? Our society in general is designed in a way that pretty much breaks the passing down of knowledge in general.
But, back to the example I was thinking of that time. Let's say somebody learns another language in school. French? Spanish? German? In general, people simply learn it and don't retain it. It's not uncommon to hear about people going to places where that language is the primary language and them really picking it up there because they've been immersed in it. Some are capable of finding ways to immerse themselves in different ways, and some are simply good at retaining that sort of info (exceptions to every norm), however the disconnection where having half a dozen people from that country teaching it to you and spending time with you to learn it isn't the same as hanging out with them, talking with their friends, meeting their parents, etc.
(Although as a brief thought at the end, I should mention that I'm criticizing the US school system primarily; I can't really argue about other ones since I don't know how different they might be.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 11:07 pm
Well, to get back on topic, do you feel that single-sex schools are less adequate than integrated schools?
Feel free to start a discussion on education systems in general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 3:53 am
I don't think home schooling or single sex education is good at all. You need to learn how to interact with other people all the time, otherwise, when you go out into the Job world, you'll have no idea how to react to certain things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 9:44 am
Right... getting more on topic, then...
Home schooling is completely different from the single-sex school situation, though. A single-sex school is a place where a kid will spend most of their day in the same place with people of the same gender and their major interactions and friends will be completely limited to one gender and that's what we're recognizing is inheritly worse about a single-sex school.
Home schooling, however, is NOT sitting on your a** at home for 8 hours while a parent or tutor drones over a book. That's what happens at school and many people who home school do so because they believe that situation to be unhealthy. Although there will be some home schooling done that way, the home schooling I've seen is less "pump crap into their head" and more "teach them stuff that they want, help them interact with the real world, encourage their natural curiosity." Interesting stuff is brought to home school kids by forming local groups and people can teach classes. I say people because the group I know sometimes has kids teaching other kids some stuff such as programming languages and the basic Computer Science data structures.
Anyways, long-winded way of saying that they're completely different. I can agree with a same-sex school generating socialization and world-view problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|