|
|
| Who do you think would make od good judge in the trial for custody?(based on suggestions.) |
| Teh_KoOL_AiD_Man |
|
20% |
[ 3 ] |
| Z |
|
20% |
[ 3 ] |
| godemperorofdune |
|
13% |
[ 2 ] |
| Nadian |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Skepty |
|
6% |
[ 1 ] |
| Cappy |
|
13% |
[ 2 ] |
| Other |
|
26% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:04 pm
Saikii locke317 Saikii locke317 You know, we really should extend the tree. Yeah. This is an important milestone. I think that a 25,000 person family tree would be going a bit overboard. Ya think? Well, the one I made with 12 names on there took around 10 minutes to get the organization right. So, 10/12 * 25,000 would be the number of minutes it would take to make the tree. Which, if you were wondering, is around 20833.33 minutes.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:06 pm
locke317 Saikii locke317 Saikii locke317 You know, we really should extend the tree. Yeah. This is an important milestone. I think that a 25,000 person family tree would be going a bit overboard. Ya think? Well, the one I made with 12 names on there took around 10 minutes to get the organization right. So, 10/12 * 25,000 would be the number of minutes it would take to make the tree. Which, if you were wondering, is around 20833.33 minutes. Cooles! So maybe the immediate family. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:08 pm
Saikii locke317 Saikii locke317 Saikii Yeah. This is an important milestone. I think that a 25,000 person family tree would be going a bit overboard. Ya think? Well, the one I made with 12 names on there took around 10 minutes to get the organization right. So, 10/12 * 25,000 would be the number of minutes it would take to make the tree. Which, if you were wondering, is around 20833.33 minutes. Cooles! So maybe the immediate family. 3nodding How many people would that be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:09 pm
locke317 Saikii locke317 Saikii locke317 Saikii Yeah. This is an important milestone. I think that a 25,000 person family tree would be going a bit overboard. Ya think? Well, the one I made with 12 names on there took around 10 minutes to get the organization right. So, 10/12 * 25,000 would be the number of minutes it would take to make the tree. Which, if you were wondering, is around 20833.33 minutes. Cooles! So maybe the immediate family. 3nodding How many people would that be? All the way from Khalida down to me and Saito
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:11 pm
Saikii locke317 Saikii locke317 Well, the one I made with 12 names on there took around 10 minutes to get the organization right. So, 10/12 * 25,000 would be the number of minutes it would take to make the tree. Which, if you were wondering, is around 20833.33 minutes. Cooles! So maybe the immediate family. 3nodding How many people would that be? All the way from Khalida down to me and Saito I did that. It is about 3 pages ago. I suppose I could put in more crew members...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:47 pm
locke317 Saikii locke317 Saikii locke317 Well, the one I made with 12 names on there took around 10 minutes to get the organization right. So, 10/12 * 25,000 would be the number of minutes it would take to make the tree. Which, if you were wondering, is around 20833.33 minutes. Cooles! So maybe the immediate family. 3nodding How many people would that be? All the way from Khalida down to me and Saito I did that. It is about 3 pages ago. I suppose I could put in more crew members... Yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:31 pm
Saikii locke317 Saikii locke317 Saikii Cooles! So maybe the immediate family. 3nodding How many people would that be? All the way from Khalida down to me and Saito I did that. It is about 3 pages ago. I suppose I could put in more crew members... Yeah. I'll do it later. I want to get back to reading my book now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:12 pm
Wow! Thought I`d never find this again... 3nodding It`s still kind of confusing. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:26 pm
Saikii Wow! Thought I`d never find this again... 3nodding You know, we should title this the Why Not family tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:33 pm
Something I said earlier in this thread made me really sad now sad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:39 pm
Itacha-Kimoji Something I said earlier in this thread made me really sad now sad What would that be, if you care to share?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:40 pm
locke317 Saikii Wow! Thought I`d never find this again... 3nodding You know, we should title this the Why Not family tree. Yeah. You know? That`s a good idea. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:41 pm
locke317 Itacha-Kimoji Something I said earlier in this thread made me really sad now sad What would that be, if you care to share? I think I know what he means. sad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:43 pm
Saikii locke317 Itacha-Kimoji Something I said earlier in this thread made me really sad now sad What would that be, if you care to share? I think I know what he means. sad I suppose it has just been too long since I last read through this thread. I guess I may be able to find out if I read it through again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:45 pm
locke317 Saikii locke317 Itacha-Kimoji Something I said earlier in this thread made me really sad now sad What would that be, if you care to share? I think I know what he means. sad I suppose it has just been too long since I last read through this thread. I guess I may be able to find out if I read it through again. Yeah. I just did myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
