|
|
It's quiet... Too quiet. |
True. |
|
37% |
[ 3 ] |
False. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Africa. |
|
62% |
[ 5 ] |
|
Total Votes : 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:57 pm
|
|
|
|
Xanatos Forever Alarias Well, as others have said, when subforums were added, guild activity went down. That's just the way it works. People don't like to go in them to post...they generally just check out the main page then leave. So, fewer subforums = more activity. eek ... sweatdrop I suppose I shouldn't be surprised to hear about that level of laziness...but yeah...WTF is all I can say to that... neutral Yeah...I've been in some guilds with like 10 or more subforums and like noone posted ever...it's a hassle going through that many links to post something so, they just didn't bother. Subforums are good but, should be kept to a minimum to avoid that...at least, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:07 am
|
|
|
|
people should be mobbing Gaia to get them to put something on the listing of subforums showing when the last post occurred in that subforum, and on which thread. I don't go into the Market subforum, for instance, because I got tired of seeing if anything had been updated. I rarely go to the games subforum because games ARE NOT the most important part of this guild. I'll pop in once in a blue moon to see if one of the more interesting threads has a new post.
IDD should have its own section. Contrary to the beliefs of a couple of our guild members, debate and discussion are not the same thing, and having a designated area for debate would make me a little bit more active because I wouldn't look at a thread title and think "oh someone has probably hijacked this into a debate and insulted the OP and therefore created a buch of useless Dwama" before scrolling down the list.
There are not enough RPs to warrant giving them their own subforum, in my opinion, Xan. They seem to be in the appropriate location with the games.
People who are know dwama-makers and attention whores should not, under any circumstances, be permitted to be mods no matter how "popular" some people might think they are, unless they can prove they have the ability to control their prepubescent girl urges. Less politikz and dwamatikz, more intelligent discourse.
That is my four cents. It's a little more than two. Feel free to kick me in the head now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:12 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:48 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:01 am
|
|
|
|
A lot of this has probably already been mentioned but I only just noticed this thread today. n__n;
It doesn't look like there are enough rps to make a roleplay sub-forum to me ( and role playing is like a game anyway so I don't see the problem with it staying in the games section. :/ ), but I like the idea of adding In Depth or Debate ones. That way those of us who actually want to be serious or debate with one another can do so there without pointless or stupid comments like 'lolz i dun no' etc. 'Cause over the past several months there have been the obvious complaints from oldbies about the ATG having dumbed down a lot. If there were separate forums for in depth stuff, then hopefully what idiots there are would just stick to spamming the main forum. ( Though I do wholly agree about keeping sub-forums to a minimum. I'm guilty of almost never checking guild sub-forums too, so. xD )
For members helping with cleaning up, there could be a thread where members can post links to threads that break the rules or need looking at by a mod. It's a fairly obvious idea, but it'd give regular members more of a chance to help out.
Moderator revision would probably be helpful. I see some mods more than others and I think there's a couple who I've never seen posting around at all. :/ Promotions, demotions, whatever. Whatever staff there is should also be taking more time to sift through member applications and such, even if it is a hassle.
I think member nominations are a good idea, however everyone would have to be careful. I've been on a lot of sites and owned a few where if the members are ever given a chance to vote about anything, they will often just choose their friends as opposed to who actually deserves whatever the vote is for, and it can just become a popularity contest. Screening for some level of experience or whatever from member nominated mods would probably be a good idea. >>; I know mods are supposed to be there to be friends as well as staff, but I'd rather have a moderator who no one likes who actually knows what they're doing and is good at it as opposed to having a moderator who everyone loves but is crap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:18 pm
|
|
|
|
`Mayako` I suggest that we have different mods deal with different situations. Like, if there are a few guild members having a hearty discussion (or argument) and it turns ugly, tell them to take it to PMs. Don't allow them to take it to ANOTHER MAIN THREAD. >__O;; We do tell members constantly to keep personal conflicts private...but, sadly sometimes people just don't listen. As for different mods dealing with different issues...well, I'm not quite sure what you mean. We do assign certain mods to some tasks. However, there are some things that any of us can take care of if need be. This allows for a better chance at resolving problems faster. For example, if you assign one mod to the task of handling member disputes, then what happens if that mod is offline and a fight breaks out? Things would get out of hand rapidly most likely. So, sometimes you can't rely on just one mod for a task to be completed. But, as I said, there are certain tasks that can be assigned and they are to help keep things running smoothly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:22 pm
|
|
|
|
Okay, I'm not a veteran of the ATG, nor do I have all that many suggestions, but I do own a guild (only 210 members, but it's been growing for a year or two now) and I've been looking at other guilds to see what's popular about them.
My comment here has nothing to do with that.
Instead, I'm addressing the various suggestions that come with the area of the RP/Games subforum. I spend more time in that subforum than I do in the main forum, to be honest. I have a thread that I started and about five other threads that I'm active in. If I see something on the front page of the main forum, I'll check it out, but it's rare that anything actually catches my attention.
Maybe if we could put one or two games in the main forum to 'break the ice' (to use the phrase that's been jumping around), new members would post there, and eventually branch out to the other topics. I'd be willing to donate my time to keeping the thread going, though I have no doubt it will be whether I help or not.
I like the idea to change the Marketplace subforum into the IDD. I never go in there... okay, I did one time, but I haven't really cared to go back. I've never really understood the point of it (though I can see how artists could use it).
Or! We could just make another subforum that encourages members to show off what they're good at, whether that be creative writing, poetry, art (which would move the art salespeople), music, or anything else. You could bring in a lot of artistic members with that.
IN CONCLUSION... all of that up there? Yeah, that's what I think on the subject. I'm glad you made it down here, and thanks for reading mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:55 pm
|
Profitable Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|