|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:14 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:19 pm
|
|
|
|
Sakura-Kyoukan So you wouldnt mind if we killed you to save a monkey from getting a makeover... well if everone thought like you. we would have lots of human volunteers for those experiments in place of the animals... but i'm sure you're not going to do that.. Hypocrit Now, carrying on an argument with the owner of this guild probably isn't a good idea, but I'm judgementally impairred.
I have a survival instinct. I would not willingly die to "save a monkey from getting a makeover". Nor would I die for any number of people. If you must know, there is only one person I would die for, but I'm not gonna get emo on you. So I say that I wouldn't die to save my entire family, or a million people. But I'd go more peacefully if I knew that, say, a million bears would be saved. Oh wait. . . that's right. . . there aren't a million bears. Nor are there a million wolves. Nor a million buffalo. No, anything larger than a dog has to die when we encroach on their territory.
Call me a hypocrite. It's not the worst I've been called.
Sakura-Kyoukan Not to mention rats and mice outnumber humans 100 to one... you wanna talk about over population! Where do most rats and mice thrive? Why, in urban areas! Yes, we have a rare case in which the animals aren't devastated by our presence.
Mouse and rat overpopulation isn't as devastating as human overpopulation for several reasons. _1: The average mouse (or rat) is far smaller than the average human. _2: The average mouse (or rat) uses far less in the way resources than the average human. _3: The average mouse (or rat) produces far less waste than the average human.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:39 pm
|
|
|
|
Mara_Brightwing WARNING *Opinion to follow* WARNING I believe animals should be treated ethically, inasmuch as they are living creatures. I do not believe, however, that they are more important than humans. I believe that we are meat eating, leather and fur wearing, pet loving, zoo visiting, safari going people. I personally own a rabbit coat, a mink stole and a fox fur collar. I wear leather shoes, eat steak and chicken, love my dog, and take my kids to the zoo and the aquarium. And know what? I don't feel the least bit guilty. If PETA thinks that their militaristic, terrorist-based actions are going to get me to change the way I live, they are dead wrong...just like the Islamic extremests are not going to get me to change the way I live. *End Opinion* Didn't understand the Islamic extremest part?What about them? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 11:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 12:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 2:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 7:11 am
|
|
|
|
Mara_Brightwing WARNING *Opinion to follow* WARNING I believe animals should be treated ethically, inasmuch as they are living creatures. I do not believe, however, that they are more important than humans. I believe that we are meat eating, leather and fur wearing, pet loving, zoo visiting, safari going people... *End Opinion*
I agree with Mara on this part. 3nodding I don't wear fur though. Why? Because I'm allergic. I did try the vegenism for four months straight, but in the end, it made me completely miserable. I love meat. And then it hit me... OMG! Other animals EAT other animals. rolleyes That made a chicken jammed between two hunks of bread all the more appealing to me.
PETA members are zealouts. They are not logical or rational. They remind me of anti-abortionists. No, I'm not pro-abortion, but if you murder an abortionist, isn't that kinda counter-productive? rolleyes I just don't get some people's ideals at all. Think, people! THINK!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 7:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 2:18 pm
|
|
|
|
IMWanderling Goddess Ace Humans like improving things - we know the world is going to end but we're still living and doing things just to say - "Hey! I did that!" As for the rats & mice, they have similarties to humans and that's why they're tested on... they're not in danger since they reproduce so fast. Besides, what's more valuable the life of one rat or a human being? While in University, I worked in the mouse lab in the Psych department. We were conducting studies on the effects of Ritalin. These mice were bred specifically with ADHD. We called them popcorn mice because they bounced around a lot. We did not hurt the mice at all. We administered Ritalin to them in their food and they became calm. We published our findings about the effectiveness in the end. The only part I didn't agree with was the gassing of the mice at the end of the experiment. Of course, the rationale was that they have a two year life span anyway and we had them for at least that long. We couldn't give them Ritalin forever. They were euthanized only because no one would take them. I took some home, as did my lab partner, but there's no way a pet store would take over a hundred hyper mice. LOL! blaugh If animals can help find a cure for diseases, I'm all for it. I prefer they didn't treat them cruely for it though. Our mice were well cared for and had lots of room to play in clean, well-lit cages with wheels for exercise and fresh food and water. I know some places are deplorable and there's no excuse for that. gonk LOL @ Popcorn Mice
I disagree with animals being treated poorly as being in nasty cages but if they're to help find cures, I'm for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|