|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:39 pm
i think we should...isnt the human world obsessed with making their lives easier? I say let's make our lives easier...with the intelligence level of 300 IQ...who need fitting in when you could invent something that'll make thousands or millions? Then let's see who'll be flocking towards you. But what I wanted to say was with that kind of IQ...we could invent many things that'll take us somewhere far far away...then we'll find out new things and answer the unknown...and ofcourse many more questions will pop up but then we'll be even more intelligent. It's really important for our brains to grow and I'd love to have a mind of 300 IQ mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:58 am
id say HELL NO! if children were that smart than once they start it all of us would probably obsolete how would we be dealt with? the children wouldnt need anything they would probably come to the conclusion that the whole world is obsolete build a rocket ship fly to Mars and build their own little colony then blow us up since we're primitive inferior life forms...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 3:15 am
I think that children should be futher incouraged to learn and become more and more intelligent - the Japanese have been doing this over time and look at some of the amazing things that come out of Japan such as Sony products for example. Yes, I think the IQ of children should be increaced as much as is comfortable for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:07 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:39 am
Why is what? Please clarify your question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:49 pm
Maybe if we make the human race smarter they will learn to think ahead before making a descion. I mean for all we know Cancer could just be evolution at work and we are too busy trying to "cure" it to notice that it is trying to help us. I mean look at ahh crap...Lance Armstrong. Survived Cancer and he is stronger than a normal human. Or maybe it is just the way of trying to prevent from over population. If it does not go in a postive way, Humans will become very lazy and very weak to the point where something small will kill all of us very quickly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:57 pm
It's a good idea in some ways, but also not a good idea in others. If people were more intelligent, then more people would probably use their intelligence for good, because they would be smart enough to know that the "evil" (for lack of a better word) people are doing nothing but damaging things. But, by the same token... Remember the movie Gattaca? The unmodified people were looked down upon, and the modified people were almost a sort of Aryan race, almost like gods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:17 pm
If you have an influx of super genuses with normal parent there are going to be major problems. I know this from personal experiance. I have submitted paper on super-string theory, FTL travel, nearly free magnetic accelerators and hyper-spatial fields (gravitation effects on tachyons). all of theese can be used to destroy everything on the planet. if you take my favorite of the devices, a simple device to change one constant (the electro-weak force) and use that to amplify that force the entire planet would under go fission according to binding energy per nuclide.I was even tempted to build such a device. This is from 3 days of being suspended.
And I am just a "regular" genuis with an IQ of a mere 180. imagine if one of the proposed supergenuises had done this, decided that it was worth it and had the time I didnt to build it.
Morals do not come with intellegence. if they did then guns would not be automatic but robots would be common.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:09 pm
jeoc If you have an influx of super genuses with normal parent there are going to be major problems. I know this from personal experiance. I have submitted paper on super-string theory, FTL travel, nearly free magnetic accelerators and hyper-spatial fields (gravitation effects on tachyons). all of theese can be used to destroy everything on the planet. if you take my favorite of the devices, a simple device to change one constant (the electro-weak force) and use that to amplify that force the entire planet would under go fission according to binding energy per nuclide.I was even tempted to build such a device. This is from 3 days of being suspended. And I am just a "regular" genuis with an IQ of a mere 180. imagine if one of the proposed supergenuises had done this, decided that it was worth it and had the time I didnt to build it. Morals do not come with intellegence. if they did then guns would not be automatic but robots would be common. If you really did think up or design stuff like that, you should be in a university somewhere, doing research with world class professors. In any case, your argument assumes that people would be prone to destroying the planet out of boredom, which is a far-cry from reality, in my opinion. Having normal parents while having an higher IQ doesn't lead to problems, having poor parents does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:32 am
I have an I.Q. somewhere near 140 i think. But I have the attention span of a coked-up ferret. I'll be doing my homework and I'll look at the ceiling and I'll imagine that a war is going on on the ceiling. We do not need supersmart people, because isn't that why we have computers for?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:41 pm
dboyzero jeoc If you have an influx of super genuses with normal parent there are going to be major problems. I know this from personal experiance. I have submitted paper on super-string theory, FTL travel, nearly free magnetic accelerators and hyper-spatial fields (gravitation effects on tachyons). all of theese can be used to destroy everything on the planet. if you take my favorite of the devices, a simple device to change one constant (the electro-weak force) and use that to amplify that force the entire planet would under go fission according to binding energy per nuclide.I was even tempted to build such a device. This is from 3 days of being suspended. And I am just a "regular" genuis with an IQ of a mere 180. imagine if one of the proposed supergenuises had done this, decided that it was worth it and had the time I didnt to build it. Morals do not come with intellegence. if they did then guns would not be automatic but robots would be common. If you really did think up or design stuff like that, you should be in a university somewhere, doing research with world class professors. In any case, your argument assumes that people would be prone to destroying the planet out of boredom, which is a far-cry from reality, in my opinion. Having normal parents while having an higher IQ doesn't lead to problems, having poor parents does. the only time that a person can truely relax is either with a group of friendly peers or a cat. if people are engineered then the potential peer group shrinks dramaticly. if this happens the percentage of thoose mal-adjusted increases nearly exponentially. This means more angry/resentful people who can do things like what i did. eventually one of them is going to do it. I am currently posting papers on string theory under a few psuedonyms. 3 of them have been offered honorary doctorates. i so far havent accepted any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:27 pm
i think that it is far more likely that bad things would come out of iq enhancement than good things. Quote: Morals do not come with intellegence. if they did then guns would not be automatic but robots would be common. what if the "geniuses" turned power hungry? einstein was a pacifist. what could he have done if he wanted to take over the world? how much worse would war get if we had people like that developing the weapons? how many more people could we kill at once? even with equally smart people developing defenses, it could still be terrible. the atomic bomb was developed decades ago, and there's still no way to stop it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:23 pm
SLydiaN i think that it is far more likely that bad things would come out of iq enhancement than good things. Quote: Morals do not come with intellegence. if they did then guns would not be automatic but robots would be common. what if the "geniuses" turned power hungry? einstein was a pacifist. what could he have done if he wanted to take over the world? how much worse would war get if we had people like that developing the weapons? how many more people could we kill at once? even with equally smart people developing defenses, it could still be terrible. the atomic bomb was developed decades ago, and there's still no way to stop it. ...such as Hitler. It would be used as a method to control the masses. You can't really define intelligence. There was a kid who was autistic and had the ability to draw anything like a camera. Personally, I would consider something like that to be genius. Who's definition of intelligence would be used, the next seat in the white house? I don't believe in fascism and i support liberal thinking, like the quote in my sig.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:04 am
TheSixStringKid SLydiaN i think that it is far more likely that bad things would come out of iq enhancement than good things. Quote: Morals do not come with intellegence. if they did then guns would not be automatic but robots would be common. what if the "geniuses" turned power hungry? einstein was a pacifist. what could he have done if he wanted to take over the world? how much worse would war get if we had people like that developing the weapons? how many more people could we kill at once? even with equally smart people developing defenses, it could still be terrible. the atomic bomb was developed decades ago, and there's still no way to stop it. ...such as Hitler. It would be used as a method to control the masses. You can't really define intelligence. There was a kid who was autistic and had the ability to draw anything like a camera. Personally, I would consider something like that to be genius. Who's definition of intelligence would be used, the next seat in the white house? I don't believe in fascism and i support liberal thinking, like the quote in my sig. more likely it would be used for genocide. once you reach a certain level of energy released at once, the results are impossible to stop. High atmsopheric dust clouds, cracked techtonic plate and other nasty things that are impossible to cope with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|