|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 10:53 am
|
|
|
|
XFox-ladX AlcoholicPancake You understand that someone will have to overthrow the current leader, then step down from power themselves. Noone would do that, and even if someone did, what would stop someone else from claiming the seat of power for their own? The idea of anarchy is stupid if you ask me, and I think you're just wasting your time even trying to sway people to waste their time to go for it. 1. I pointed out anarchy is most likelly imposible. 2. Imposible isn't the same as stupid. Besides, I have the right to dream. 3. I'm not trying to sway people to go for it. Heck, I'm not even an anarchist, as far as I'm concerned. I just like some of the ideas.
1.An extended period of anarchy will never happen, unless a civil breaks out. That's the only way it could be considered an anarchy
2. Yes, you do have the right to dream I suppose. I don't see why you don't dream about naked women instead though.
and 3. Well hey, if you say your not trying to sway people, I'ma a trust you on that. Anyway, some people like the ideas, and some don't, to each their own I suppose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AkioRiku generated a random number between
2 and 7 ...
5!
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 11:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 12:02 pm
|
|
|
|
AlcoholicPancake XFox-ladX AlcoholicPancake You understand that someone will have to overthrow the current leader, then step down from power themselves. Noone would do that, and even if someone did, what would stop someone else from claiming the seat of power for their own? The idea of anarchy is stupid if you ask me, and I think you're just wasting your time even trying to sway people to waste their time to go for it. 1. I pointed out anarchy is most likelly imposible. 2. Imposible isn't the same as stupid. Besides, I have the right to dream. 3. I'm not trying to sway people to go for it. Heck, I'm not even an anarchist, as far as I'm concerned. I just like some of the ideas. 1.An extended period of anarchy will never happen, unless a civil breaks out. That's the only way it could be considered an anarchy 2. Yes, you do have the right to dream I suppose. I don't see why you don't dream about naked women instead though. and 3. Well hey, if you say your not trying to sway people, I'ma a trust you on that. Anyway, some people like the ideas, and some don't, to each their own I suppose.
Here's my imput: Anarchy is not meant to be a form of goverment (or rather lack there of). It is meant as a means of overthrowing a govermental system in order to form another govermental system. Again it does not signify a land without a ruler, it signifies a period of time without a rulor, where a rulor is bieng decided.
I think that the modern view of anarchy is a raped one myself. Humanity can't just lay down it's weapons and NOT FIGHT for a while, let alone forever. That's why anarchy is considered so chaotic in nature, because we can always rely on somone to hate somone else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 2:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 2:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 4:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 5:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 6:43 pm
|
|
|
|
MoonMongoose shram MoonMongoose Sorry to get back to the Topic, but... SHAZAM!!!
Behold My British Charm and Fear!
I so hav emore british charm then you pirate
: Shram The ATG Vampire Leader ... Thanks to my morbid sence of curiosity, I've just spent the last hour or so rummaging through this thread trying to find your pictures.
Conclusion: You win. You ooze british charm. ^_^
I dunno, you guys are both pretty British-ee... Mabye you should have a Britt-off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 6:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 6:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 6:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 7:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|