|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:58 pm
why have they made three king kong remakes but not a sequel,i know there is a book out there,i have it and it is about time they make a sequel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:39 am
personally, I'm glad they didnt. sequels usually suck. especially in horror flicks. they get dumber and dumber.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:51 pm
well you havent read the book yet,it's really good and kong actually finds other kongs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 4:01 am
books are one thing. but much of the time, when they turn a book into the movie, they butcher it. especially if it's a sequel. that just seem to be how it pans out 90% of the time. there are a few exceptions, but not many.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:25 am
i hate book-movie movies they always skrew about everything in it and i certianaly will hope they dont butcher the hitman movie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:50 pm
i personaly dont care if they base it off of the book or not,i'm just so tired of seeing kong struck down again and again and again
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:41 am
If the sequel is completely different from the original I think they should do it. I am kind of sick of the same thing repeated over and over again
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|