|
|
| Do you have what it takes? |
| Hell yes i do |
|
40% |
[ 11 ] |
| Maybe... whats it to you b***h! |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| *magic option* |
|
55% |
[ 15 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:04 pm
 |
|
|
|
bluegrass cat angel_half82 Sakura-Kyoukan I'm still considering it, we will have more mods at a later time. but for right now i think things are going ok. I already have a couple people in mind but keep commenting in this thread, it's fun to read. XD I love getting to use my DAMN! /gif. It makes meh happy. you should use the "that's racist" one. that one is always appropriate. xd
Oh I used it.
http://www.gaiaonline.com/guilds/viewtopic.php?t=11059049&page=3 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:31 am
|
|
|
 |
angel_half82 bluegrass cat angel_half82 Sakura-Kyoukan I'm still considering it, we will have more mods at a later time. but for right now i think things are going ok. I already have a couple people in mind but keep commenting in this thread, it's fun to read. XD I love getting to use my DAMN! /gif. It makes meh happy. you should use the "that's racist" one. that one is always appropriate. xd Oh I used it. ]http://www.gaiaonline.com/guilds/viewtopic.php?t=11059049&page=3
haha, awesome! xd
and canada is so much more than a nationality! its TOTALLY a race! rofl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:45 pm
|
|
|
|
bluegrass cat angel_half82 bluegrass cat angel_half82 Sakura-Kyoukan I'm still considering it, we will have more mods at a later time. but for right now i think things are going ok. I already have a couple people in mind but keep commenting in this thread, it's fun to read. XD I love getting to use my DAMN! /gif. It makes meh happy. you should use the "that's racist" one. that one is always appropriate. xd Oh I used it. ]http://www.gaiaonline.com/guilds/viewtopic.php?t=11059049&page=3
haha, awesome! xd
and canada is so much more than a nationality! its TOTALLY a race! rofl
No its a way of life eh? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:17 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:21 am
|
|
|
|
hey, saku, i had a question, and i couldn't think of a better place to post it then here, where all the mods, former mods, wanna-be mods, etc will read it!
3nodding location, location, location!
anyway, i was reading the "how not to be a n00b" thread, and i noticed something in the language concerning "arguing" with a mod.
the way its worded, it makes it sound like we can't even DEBATE a non-mod issue with a mod and that they're always right in all things...making them...god? sweatdrop
now, i know, and you know, that its not meant to be taken that way, but i was wondering, on behalf of n00bs everywhere, if the wording should be tinkered with a tad?
the way it is now, it kinda encourages sac-hanging by n00bs on current mods, massive ego complexes, and just general bad feelings all around.
xd or maybe its just me...
ha. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:15 am
|
|
|
|
bluegrass cat hey, saku, i had a question, and i couldn't think of a better place to post it then here, where all the mods, former mods, wanna-be mods, etc will read it! 3nodding location, location, location! anyway, i was reading the "how not to be a n00b" thread, and i noticed something in the language concerning "arguing" with a mod. the way its worded, it makes it sound like we can't even DEBATE a non-mod issue with a mod and that they're always right in all things...making them...god? sweatdrop now, i know, and you know, that its not meant to be taken that way, but i was wondering, on behalf of n00bs everywhere, if the wording should be tinkered with a tad? the way it is now, it kinda encourages sac-hanging by n00bs on current mods, massive ego complexes, and just general bad feelings all around. xd or maybe its just me... ha. xp
I'll take this one.
"Answering back" really isn't the best word to use there. She means disrespect for the moderators. For example. Let's say you were warned for not adding a poll. We saw this alot, where a newbie would return a pm.
Situation 1: (This is acceptable):
"I didn't realize that was a rule. Could you let me back into the guild because I didn't know?"
That's won't get you in any trouble. It's perfectly fine to question a warning from a mod.
Situation 2: (This is unacceptable):
"WHY THE HELL DID YOU MOVE MY THREAD? IT SAYS GENERAL DISCUSSION STUPID, I CAN WRITE WHAT I WANT THERE."
The problem here isn't what they're saying, it's how they're saying it. Instead of asking "can I write what I want in GD", they're telling the mod what to do. Condescending and rudeness violate the TOS on gaia, and will always result in a ban.
Believe it or not, we have alot of trouble with this in the guild, perhaps due to the number of newer members, or perhaps due to the number of members who think guild moderators don't have authority.
You are allowed to debate non-mod topics with a moderator, the same as with any member; however, if you flame or troll, you will be banned whether that member is a moderator or not.
I hope that cleared things up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:22 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:30 pm
|
|
|
|
Awiergan Resurrection bluegrass cat hey, saku, i had a question, and i couldn't think of a better place to post it then here, where all the mods, former mods, wanna-be mods, etc will read it! 3nodding location, location, location! anyway, i was reading the "how not to be a n00b" thread, and i noticed something in the language concerning "arguing" with a mod. the way its worded, it makes it sound like we can't even DEBATE a non-mod issue with a mod and that they're always right in all things...making them...god? sweatdrop now, i know, and you know, that its not meant to be taken that way, but i was wondering, on behalf of n00bs everywhere, if the wording should be tinkered with a tad? the way it is now, it kinda encourages sac-hanging by n00bs on current mods, massive ego complexes, and just general bad feelings all around. xd or maybe its just me... ha. xp I'll take this one. "Answering back" really isn't the best word to use there. She means disrespect for the moderators. For example. Let's say you were warned for not adding a poll. We saw this alot, where a newbie would return a pm. Situation 1: (This is acceptable): "I didn't realize that was a rule. Could you let me back into the guild because I didn't know?" That's won't get you in any trouble. It's perfectly fine to question a warning from a mod. Situation 2: (This is unacceptable): "WHY THE HELL DID YOU MOVE MY THREAD? IT SAYS GENERAL DISCUSSION STUPID, I CAN WRITE WHAT I WANT THERE." The problem here isn't what they're saying, it's how they're saying it. Instead of asking "can I write what I want in GD", they're telling the mod what to do. Condescending and rudeness violate the TOS on gaia, and will always result in a ban. Believe it or not, we have alot of trouble with this in the guild, perhaps due to the number of newer members, or perhaps due to the number of members who think guild moderators don't have authority. You are allowed to debate non-mod topics with a moderator, the same as with any member; however, if you flame or troll, you will be banned whether that member is a moderator or not. I hope that cleared things up.
naw, i get it, i'm saying that n00bs ((for which the thread was created)) might NOT get it...
it seems to be a problem i see on a lot of forums. in fact, one i've been a member of FOREVER has their mods always use "MOD" in subject headings if its pm's or "I'M PUTTING MY MOD HAT ON" if its in a topic. 3nodding
but yeah...i get it. 3nodding i always got it. i'm just concerned those with ah...um...well, can't think of a nice way to say it. i'm just concerned those with half a brain don't get it. sweatdrop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:02 pm
|
|
|
|
Kyumi Atsuki Thanatos Phoenix spudded fish i would love to be a mod its like a gaia dream :p No it´s not...... I don´t want to be a mod..... stare I wouldn want to be a mod, even though i think i would be a good one, im just too lazy to bother.... stare
my only problem with being a mod would be my tone.
since i work with small children all day, my default scoldy mode is hands on my hips, head tilted to the side "and just what were you thinking when you hurt so-and-so's feelings? is that nice? hmmm?". sweatdrop
angel gets verra upset with me when i use it on him and don't realize it. rofl
stare
come to think of it, that tone might actually work out quite nicely in this guild.
ninja
hell, put me on the list of "people who wouldn't mind modding", saku. wink |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:33 am
|
|
|
|
bluegrass cat Awiergan Resurrection bluegrass cat hey, saku, i had a question, and i couldn't think of a better place to post it then here, where all the mods, former mods, wanna-be mods, etc will read it! 3nodding location, location, location! anyway, i was reading the "how not to be a n00b" thread, and i noticed something in the language concerning "arguing" with a mod. the way its worded, it makes it sound like we can't even DEBATE a non-mod issue with a mod and that they're always right in all things...making them...god? sweatdrop now, i know, and you know, that its not meant to be taken that way, but i was wondering, on behalf of n00bs everywhere, if the wording should be tinkered with a tad? the way it is now, it kinda encourages sac-hanging by n00bs on current mods, massive ego complexes, and just general bad feelings all around. xd or maybe its just me... ha. xp I'll take this one. "Answering back" really isn't the best word to use there. She means disrespect for the moderators. For example. Let's say you were warned for not adding a poll. We saw this alot, where a newbie would return a pm. Situation 1: (This is acceptable): "I didn't realize that was a rule. Could you let me back into the guild because I didn't know?" That's won't get you in any trouble. It's perfectly fine to question a warning from a mod. Situation 2: (This is unacceptable): "WHY THE HELL DID YOU MOVE MY THREAD? IT SAYS GENERAL DISCUSSION STUPID, I CAN WRITE WHAT I WANT THERE." The problem here isn't what they're saying, it's how they're saying it. Instead of asking "can I write what I want in GD", they're telling the mod what to do. Condescending and rudeness violate the TOS on gaia, and will always result in a ban. Believe it or not, we have alot of trouble with this in the guild, perhaps due to the number of newer members, or perhaps due to the number of members who think guild moderators don't have authority. You are allowed to debate non-mod topics with a moderator, the same as with any member; however, if you flame or troll, you will be banned whether that member is a moderator or not. I hope that cleared things up. naw, i get it, i'm saying that n00bs ((for which the thread was created)) might NOT get it... it seems to be a problem i see on a lot of forums. in fact, one i've been a member of FOREVER has their mods always use "MOD" in subject headings if its pm's or "I'M PUTTING MY MOD HAT ON" if its in a topic. 3nodding but yeah...i get it. 3nodding i always got it. i'm just concerned those with ah...um...well, can't think of a nice way to say it. i'm just concerned those with half a brain don't get it. sweatdrop
(in case it needs to be said, I'm just messin' ^.^) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
