|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 4:45 pm
|
|
|
|
123jimmy321 Le King 123jimmy321 I never stated that it wasn't allowed at all. loophole exploit loophole exploit wahmbulance It's what I do best. o my redface
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 4:46 pm
|
|
|
|
Le King 123jimmy321 Le King 123jimmy321 I never stated that it wasn't allowed at all. loophole exploit loophole exploit wahmbulance It's what I do best. o my redface I can't wait for this game to start there is going to be 2 games before mine Djs and someones else I don't remember who else at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 5:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:38 pm
|
|
|
|
123jimmy321 Le King Let's make it a 3-post spam, shall we? @ all-killa-game: another way to cancel death could be to figure out who killed you. That will make it not a free-for-all. Hmm. King you know how many people would target you if you played! Who said I would play this. rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:39 pm
|
|
|
|
123jimmy321 Le King Let's make it a 3-post spam, shall we? @ all-killa-game: another way to cancel death could be to figure out who killed you. That will make it not a free-for-all. Hmm. King you know how many people would target you if you played! Also nobody.
neutral
Try me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:53 pm
|
|
|
|
Le King We came up with this last game and hammered it out to make it hilarious and winnable. It's a free-for all. Odd number kill person A = person A dies Even number kill person A = deaths cancel out and A lives Only one winner. If 2 people remain, everyone loses. It will be hilarious to watch. rofl
If A targets B: • B targets A, and C targets A, we're on 2. • B targets A, and C targets B, we're still on 2. • B targets C, and C targets A, everyone dies. If A targets C: • B targets A, and C targets A, we're on 2. • B targets A, and C targets B, everyone dies. • B targets C, and C targets A, we're still on 2. Am I looking at it wrong?
I knew the info would be true. The player was new, had been jailed or killed, and there'd already been an alliance backstab. The safest gold was the one offered.
Quote: @ all-killa-game: another way to cancel death could be to figure out who tried to kill ed you. That will make it not a free-for-all. I really don't see how that would work in a 3-players-remaining scenario. Is that what you meant?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:05 pm
|
|
|
|
Le King 123jimmy321 Le King Let's make it a 3-post spam, shall we? @ all-killa-game: another way to cancel death could be to figure out who killed you. That will make it not a free-for-all. Hmm. King you know how many people would target you if you played! Also nobody. neutral Try me. We'll see about that lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:17 pm
|
|
|
|
Vigoureux If A targets B: • B targets A, and C targets A, we're on 2. • B targets A, and C targets B, we're still on 2. • B targets C, and C targets A, everyone dies. If A targets C: • B targets A, and C targets A, we're on 2. • B targets A, and C targets B, everyone dies. • B targets C, and C targets A, we're still on 2.
yES
my brain broke a little but yup!
And "tried to kill you" is what I meant. Yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:24 pm
|
|
|
|
Le King Vigoureux If A targets B: • B targets A, and C targets A, we're on 2. • B targets A, and C targets B, we're still on 2. • B targets C, and C targets A, everyone dies. If A targets C: • B targets A, and C targets A, we're on 2. • B targets A, and C targets B, everyone dies. • B targets C, and C targets A, we're still on 2. Yes My brain broke a little but yup!
But if it's "Only one winner. If 2 people remain, everyone loses." then everyone loses in all scenarios. Unless the point is to make everyone play until they notice. ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:29 pm
|
|
|
|
Vigoureux Le King Vigoureux If A targets B: • B targets A, and C targets A, we're on 2. • B targets A, and C targets B, we're still on 2. • B targets C, and C targets A, everyone dies. If A targets C: • B targets A, and C targets A, we're on 2. • B targets A, and C targets B, everyone dies. • B targets C, and C targets A, we're still on 2. Yes My brain broke a little but yup! But if it's "Only one winner. If 2 people remain, everyone loses." then everyone loses in all scenarios. Unless the point is to make everyone play until they notice. ninja
Not necessarily.
3 would make it unwinable. 2 will make it a loss.
Their goal should be to end up with at least 4 people in the final round.
The whole point of it was to make them talk to each other and figure out who's killing whom and who should die to have the correct numbers.
It's meant to be a numbers game.
But more importantly, it's meant to be hilarious for the host.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|