|
|
X-men 3 |
1 |
|
8% |
[ 2 ] |
2 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
3 |
|
20% |
[ 5 ] |
4 |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
5 |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
6 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
7 |
|
8% |
[ 2 ] |
8 |
|
20% |
[ 5 ] |
9 |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
10 |
|
29% |
[ 7 ] |
|
Total Votes : 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 9:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 9:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 10:55 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 6:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 2:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 4:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:10 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 7:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:02 pm
|
|
|
|
Eordia_Geese the director totally ******** up the movie! 1.Gambit was suppose to be in it. 2. nobody should of died 3.juggernot should of been bigger 4.nightcrwaler wasn't in it. 5. they made angel look boring 6.they didn't give mystique enough screen time 7.the director tryed to make it funny to much 8.they killed off to many characters 9.they should of made a better showdown seen with the phoenix 10.they should of stuck to the tv series and took things into space, and explain what the phoenix orgin was and what it's suppose to protect. 11.storm is stronger then what they made her look. she should of never been getting her a** whoop like that. 12.if ur a true fan of the show the movie didn't make no damn sense. 13.in my opinion the 3rd movie should of been of mr.sinster, then it could go into the 4th and last one which should be on apocalypse. 14.last but not lease if your gonna do a movie on the phoenix do it right. 15.1 good thing i will say is the phoneix was looking up to par 16.Yes i am a extremly pissed off X-man fanatic!
Fanatic? Pfft... Then you'd know that there ARE multiple Xmen story lines and plots...
There's the comics(Multiple ones to be exact...), TV series, the Ultimate line, and even the Evolution spin off...Now, each has it's own devote fans, and each has very distinct differences. If the director went completly off of one line or "realm" then all the other fans would have been offended.
Not only that, but there have been different artists and authors working in the franchise and bringing in their own ideas and plots that the original author's intent was most likely lost long ago. Hence all the varience in the back stories, character solo-comics, What If's, and the multiple spin offs.
Plus, if he pulled all the plot holes that the comics have(Aliens, clones, all that)- the mass public woud have been like "WTF?". There were already a ton of reffrences to the original story lines and fandom humor already(Hopefully I don't need to tell you where "I'm the juggernaught b***h" or Collosus throwing Wolveriene came from...), the normal ones mustn't know about the entire fandom. They'd be scared!
So, to make everyone happy, he had to pull together the best of all the worlds, and try to bring it together so that normal people- those who can't name every Xmen, arch, and story line- would understand and enjoy.
And Storm DOES get her a** whopped by Calysto a few times until she kicks Calysto's a**. Nightcrawler's absence is explained in the game X2.5, Juggernaught's original design was not anatomicaly correct. You can't FIND a human that big or with those proportions...Nor would you WANT to..
And I'm damn pissed about there being no gambit too... I've heard multiple rumors on that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:06 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:20 pm
|
|
|
|
Sheer_Immortal To the OP (or any mods floating around) - Can you throw a (*SPOILER*) warning in the title, please? (*thinks that a spoiler warning should be mandatory in topics like this*) Was Calysto the speedy chick? I never did catch her name in the movie. And what was up with the nurse at the very end? She seemed to recognize Xavier. But then, she was in the case study video that they showed in class, so never mind. sweatdrop I shouldn't have to go out and pay money on a game that's probably crappy anyway to have a character's absence explained. I want my Nightcrawler, dang nabbit. mad And I, one of the "normal people," thought that Angel looked cool. And the Beast guy made me giggle because it was Frasier kicking a** ^.^ They have to make a fourth movie now, "Last Stand" or not. I wanna know if Cyclops got sent into some mindless guy too, or if that one guy was just an insurance policy for Xavier or what. I agree spoiler warning but the movie is the best ever hope you set through the credits if you didn't you missed out big time biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:24 pm
|
|
|
|
Ulterior_Motives I wrote up a nice rant on this in my movie guild... It's decent. The editing drove me nuts, it jumped around and switched camera far too many times were simple movements or change of focus would have sufficed. The body count was higher than I anticipated, and that kinda drove me nuts too. There were MANY geek-gasmic moments. Speedball Special showed up a few times. As well as many well known quotes from the comics. It was also extremly entertaining to try to catch all the cameos from the other marvel superheros, and he man in charge of the franchise himself(He's in every one of the marvel movies-pulls a hitchcock I guess) Nightcrawler's absense is explained in the video game X2.5 I'm not gonna spoil it though. I was dissapointed at a lack of gambit. Though, he could have an entire movie and be cool enough to pull it off. X2.5? Game or movie?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|