Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

That my logic is perfect is a statement of fact. Challenging this fact is the height of arrogance. Don't do it or I will verbally abuse you and sell you as a sex slave to Mother Russia.

My face is missing, but I don't blame you. Though I probably should, but I won't kill you for it. Though the blood would soothe the pain, but it would be a temporary delight...

I'll go torture a cat now.

People will use the lamest excuses in an attempt to justify the prohibition of drugs.

A common one is the claim that drugs are harmful. This is a lie, of course, but let's just ignore that. By harmful people usually mean detrimental to one's health. My first thought is: So what? What is it to you? Should we also ban McD? How about we inform people of the potential dangers and let them have some personal responsibility? I.e. let's treat adults like adults.
Another concern is that addiction will harm a person's relations to family, friends and, most importantly, workplace. To which I can only say: And your solution is to lock them up, ruin their lives and render them unemployable? Here, have some more kool-aid, dimwit.

Another moronic excuse is that drugs are usually sold by criminals, who use the money to support their unlawful ways. This is a good point, actually. If only people would stop buying alcohol from the mob, it would effectively undermine the power of said mob. Oh wait, people don't buy alcohol from criminals anymore because alcohol is legal. Funny how that works, eh?

Anyway, I really shouldn't have to argue for legalization. It should be the idiots who should be forced to justify their "right to oppress", to take away my personal responsibility and to criminalize me for no good reason. They have, so far, utterly failed to do this.

Another random thought: While examining the idea of drugs being harmful I decided to go to the roots of the matter: To make a blanket statement like that you must think that there is something all drugs have in common. So what is that thing? It's not that they are detrimental to your health, because not all drugs are. It's not that they are addictive, because, again, not all drugs are. So what is it? The answer is obvious, of course: The one thing all drugs have in common is that they can be used to enjoy yourself. So if I were to assume that those who are in favour of prohibition have actually made an informed, rational decision on the matter, I can only come to the conclusion that they are puritan tyrans who hate the idea of others having fun.

Personally, I am of the opinion that such people can go ******** themselves (in as unpleasant a manner as possible, of course. Not that they would have it any other way).

If the concept of an object is not based on evidence (observation), then the object does not exist. In other words: Made up stuff is not real.

Fluffy the Iguana approves of this message.

GOBBLE! GOBBLE! GOBBLE! GOBBLE! GOBBLE!

Hell (originally "Hel" wink was thought to be a cold place by the people who practiced Norse mythology. Fire has in the past been associated with life, so it's easy to understand why a place of death was thought to be cold. By associating Hell, a place of suffering, with fire Christians would seem to think that to live is to suffer. Their obsession over getting into Heaven, which requires that you die, doesn't exactly help either on My view of Christians being life-fearing idiots...

.
"There exists no basis for believing in God."

The above statement has yet to be proven untrue, so why do Christians insist on defying logic? The simplest answer must be because they are incapable of comprehending deduction.
In other words: Christians are stupid.

EDIT: Lol. I'm such a dumbass.